Category Archives: Intellectual Property

What is Intellectual Property Part 2

What is Intellectual Property? A Guide for Start Ups (Part 2 of 2)

What is Intellectual Property Part 2In this second blog post for ambitious start-ups during global entrepreneurship week, I focus on names, copyright and designs, as well as know how.

In the first blog post, What is Intellectual Property? A Guide for Start Ups (Part 1 of 2), I looked at patents and trade secrets.

There is much a well-informed start-up can do to protect its IP without spending a lot of money. The trick is having an IP strategy and knowing how to manage IP issues.

IP issues for names

As mentioned in an earlier blog, a start-up is not free to choose whatever name it likes. There are legal considerations to take into account. Finding a name that is available to use can be difficult due to the sheer volume of existing trademark registrations, and the fact that similar names are a problem.

For example, as discussed in our blog post, Facebook Users Mourning the Removal of Scrabulous, the name “Scrabulous” was too similar to “Scrabble”. As a result, the Scrabulous Facebook App which had attracted thousands of followers had to rebrand.

Trademark clearance checks are necessary to avoid infringing on the rights of others. While you can do some basic checks yourself, you need advice from a good trademark lawyer before you settle on a name. Names are an important way in which the law protects a business, so it is worth taking time to pick a good, legally effective one.

Once the name is picked, and checked – this might involve international searches if your business is going to be online – you need to register a trademark. You also need to be ready to extend that registration internationally.  Registration can be costly, so a business without a budget for IP would do well to delay choosing its ultimate brand name.

Disasters due to ill-advised name choices

Trademark disasters can befall any business, even multinationals such as Microsoft. Microsoft was forced to rename its cloud storage service SkyDrive to OneDrive following a trademark infringement dispute with BSkyB. Start-ups face similar problems all too often, they just don’t attract media attention. An important difference between start-ups and the Apples, Amazons, and Microsofts of this world is that start-ups lack the resources to get themselves out of trouble.

If a start-up has to rebrand for infringing on the rights of others it could sink altogether. As I explained in my blog post, Rebranding: Legal Issues you can’t afford to ignore, don’t shrug off the risks by assuming you will just rebrand if it comes to it. A rebrand involves changing everything at short notice and it will rarely be possible to divert customers from your old URL to the new one. Taking a risk over your name is a gamble – not a sensible business decision.

To avoid problems it is best to go with a temporary name initially. The time to fix on a name is once the business concept is proven and there is a budget for IP checks, registrations and designs.

One strategy might be to start off using a descriptive name. As descriptive names cannot be registered as trademarks, you’re on safe ground using them. You can choose a distinctive brand name later, when resources allow. You can always keep your descriptive name at that stage by making it your tagline.

Businesses that need a budget for names from the outset

On the other hand, you may be starting a business where it is essential to build a brand. In a blog post a few years ago, I explained how Zumba’s success is due in part to its name. Zumba is a distinctive name that in no way describes its dance fitness business.

If yours is such a business – one that needs an effective brand name in order to succeed – then you would not be able to use a temporary name. You would need to find funds to consider trademarks before embarking on the business.

If Zumba had chosen its name but failed to register a trademark before the dance took off, its rapid success could have meant the founders were no longer able to register ‘Zumba’ as a trademark. This is a peculiarity of trademark law. Zumba’s wild success might have made the name generic and therefore incapable of registration.

It is generally advisable to register a trademark, as that is how you own the rights to a name. By registering their name, Zumba were able to capture the value that their success generated. Without it they would not have been able to exploit their brand for categories such as videos, clothing, books, and so on. And, the business would be worth only a fraction of what it is worth today.

So, if your success hangs on creating a brand, and licensing others to use your name, you won’t make it big unless you spend on international trademarks.

Copyright and designs

It may be that the key to protecting your business is not patents or trademarks, but copyright of a piece of software or other item.

According to research by the IPO, 40 per cent of business owners think they automatically own the copyright if they commission work which is capable of being protected by copyright.  This is the single biggest mistake businesses make. Paying someone to create work does not automatically make you the owner of the copyright in it.

So, it’s important to understand what types of material are protected by copyright. That way, you can secure the rights over anything that matters to your business.  For example, logos are protected by copyright. As the owner of a business, you need to ensure you own the copyright in your logo.

If you are using another company or a freelancer to develop your software (or other items that are protected by copyright) then make sure ownership in the work is transferred to you in writing. This should be done before you engage their services, for example in the contract you enter into with them. But this does not need to be done in a formal contract. It could be dealt with in an email. See my blog post: Why use a lawyer when you can buy a legal agreement? for further guidance.

If you have a design created for you such as a cartoon character, logo, surface designs, or an unusual shape, (such as the coca cola bottle) make sure you obtain the rights. But note that there is a limited time to register these as designs. There are official fees to pay when you register designs, so be clear whether the design in question is going to give you a competitive advantage or not. If you think it might, then try to find the money for design registration.

Know how

Finally, bear in mind that you may want to exploit any know how you develop. This will be discussed in a later blog post, Licensing and franchising: what is the difference and does it matter?

Say you are a car wash that has developed a successful process for getting its customers to buy for hot wax and other optional extras. You might decide to license this process to other car wash businesses in return for royalties. This involves a legal agreement whereby you license your know how and ensure the other party uses it under strict conditions of confidentiality.

Conclusion

If you are thinking big, you need to understand IP and how it applies to your business.  If you have the funds from the start, you can use IP to protect your competitive position straight away. If not, you can position your business so that you secure your IP once it grows and you have the resources in place.

For more information about trademark registration and protecting your brand, visit our dedicated trademark website www.azrightstrademarkregistration.co.uk.

hat is Intellectual PropertyA Guide for Start Ups (part 1 and 2)

What is Intellectual Property? A Guide for Start Ups (part 1 of 2)

What is Intellecutal Property - GuideTo mark global entrepreneurship week, we are dedicating two blog posts to start-ups that are thinking big. This first one will cover patents and trade secrets and the second will be on trademarks and copyright.

A start-up’s intellectual property strategy needs to take account of their budget (usually limited) and business objectives.

The single most important piece of advice I would give to a start-up is that they need to find out about intellectual property (IP) and how it affects their business. Lack of funding for IP protection is not a reason to bury your head in the sand and could prove costly as the business grows.

What is Intellectual Property?

IP is an umbrella term for a range of separate legal rights, which protect a business and increase its value. These rights relate to the business name and logo, unique software that sets it apart from competitors, clever inventions, creative designs, or secret recipes and know how.

IP Rights

The main IP rights are patents, designs, trademarks, copyright and trade secrets or know how.

Patents protect inventions of products or processes, and relate to the way things work, what they do, how they do it, what they are made of or how they are made.  Patents are not concerned with the visual appearance of products – that is the domain of registered designs.

Trademark is the legal term covering brand names and other signs.

Copyright protects a diverse range of materials including websites, software, logos, the written word, music, art and more. There are some surprising rules within copyright law, so ownership will not always be with the person you expect.

Know how or trade secrets are two of the most important and valuable types of IP. To retain their value they must be kept secret and their disclosure tightly controlled. Once the secret is out in the public domain it can no longer be protected.

The terminology around IP is often confused in the media, leading people to think a name can be copyrighted or a book patented, and so on.  So, it’s worth taking the time to understand the difference between IP rights if you have big plans for your business.

In this first blog post I will discuss patents, and trade secrets, while the second instalment will cover the other IP rights.

An ambitious business that takes the time to understand IP can do a lot to protect its position. Often, there are alternative (less expensive) strategies for protecting yourself.

Trade secrets v Patents

If a patent is not essential for your business model you could simply guard your innovation as a trade secret until you have the resources to patent it. The software industry is an example of a business model where patents are rarely critical to the business model. Copyright is the IP to focus on when software is a significant element of your business model.

Where it is possible to use an invention without its inner workings being on display you can use the innovation while keeping its details a secret. This preserves the possibility of patenting it later once resources allow, unless someone else files a patent first.

Indeed in some cases, you may decide never to apply for a patent. As patenting involves revealing the details of how you achieve something you may prefer to keep that information private. For example, the Coca Cola recipe has been kept a tightly controlled secret for 100 years. Had they patented it, the recipe would have been protected for 20 years and would then have been available to others to use freely. As it is, Coca Cola has preserved the life of its innovation by not patenting it.

Whether this approach is suitable for your innovation depends on its nature. The question you need to ask is how likely are others to stumble across the same thing?

Every business is unique

Every business is different and will need to develop an IP strategy that reflects its plans; one size does not fit all. There is nothing that says you must always protect your inventions, or that you can ignore patents just because you’re a start up. The business model and what you are selling determines the IP steps you should take.

How does intellectual property affect your business model? It may be best not to pursue some ideas if there is no budget for an essential patent, or an essential trademark registration. On the other hand, for many businesses such IP issues may not be critical.

So, the first step is to find out whether your IP risks and opportunities can be managed with minimal expenditure in the business’s early days. Full IP protection can then follow once the business has sufficient resources.

Business ideas that require a patent

The experience of Mandy Haberman, inventor of the Anywayup Cup, illustrates the type of business that it may be best to avoid if you cannot afford to protect essential IP rights such as patents and trademarks. Otherwise, if you succeed, a better-resourced entity may copy you.

In Mandy’s case, as soon as other manufacturers realised there was consumer interest in her product, they copied it and produced similar cups. As this Guardian article explains, she took them to court to protect her business.

“Because I had patents,” said Mandy, “I was able to go to court, defend my idea, enforce my patent rights and that meant that I kept my monopoly in the market. This made me a lot of money; if I had not had the patents, I would not have made anything.”

So, if you want to make it big avoid embarking on projects where patent protection is essential from the start. These are the sorts of business in which the dragons in Dragons’ Den lose interest when they discover there is no IP protection, or that the patent protection is too weak.

Owning IP puts you in a strong position. Don’t let thoughts of the difficulty of enforcing your rights stop you getting the legal protection you need in the first place. Often, simply owning IP rights is enough to avoid disputes arising.

Business name

In the next blog post I will discuss the importance of names. For example, “Anywayup Cup” is the name by which leak-proof children’s cups are known. Long after their patent expires, the brand will live on. Consider the many other inventions that have become synonymous with their names – Asprin, Hoover, Kleenex to name a few – and you will agree that names are one of the most important form of IP.

I will also discuss copyright in my next post. It is one of the most universally applicable rights but it often catches people out due to the nature of the copyright rules.

In the meantime, if this article has prompted some questions about what IP means to your business, why not book a free consultation with our intellectual property team .

Naming your start-up

Naming your start-up: tips for lasting success

Naming your start-upThe notion that the main consideration when choosing a new brand name is its availability as a .com domain is widespread. What is less well known is that you may not be free to use your chosen domain name if the name would infringe on someone else’s trademark rights.

Countless start-ups regularly trip up because they do not realise they need a legal opinion to assess whether the name is free to use. So, there is no point paying substantial sums buying domains as one early stage business owner I met did a while ago. He had paid £10,000 for a .com domain only to be challenged by the owner of a similar trademark when he began using it for his new business. The disruption and financial consequences were an irritating distraction for him. It was completely avoidable. Had he consulted a trademark lawyer before choosing a name he could have avoided this set back. However, many business owners are reluctant to pay for a professional opinion, regarding this as an unnecessary expense. Ironically, this particular business owner, then went out and bought another domain name, again without having any checks, and only turned to us to register it for him. He was lucky that this time there were no problems with the name.

As this is a topic of interest to me, I was amazed when I came across a recent blog post from the CEO and co-founder of “Skilljar” which focused purely on whether the .com was available when choosing a name. In that case the business was changing its name, and surely this is one time when you really don’t want to get it wrong. The disruption of changing names 3 times would be so distracting and wasteful for the business.

Based on her experience of not being able to purchase the .com to the name she was using – Everpath – Sandi Lin decided to abandon use of the name, Everpath (even though her company held every other domain variation, including the important .net) and set off in search of a new name for which the .com domain would be available.

Using the crowdsourcing platform, Squadhelp, she searched for available domain names, and settled on the name “Skilljar”. She was convinced the crowdsourcing site would minimise the time involved searching for a new name. Based on over 800 submissions, she was inspired to pick a new name. Using ‘skill’ and ‘master’ as roots to search for names on Sedo, a domain name auction site, for ‘Buy now’ listings she then found several names that were available to buy within a maximum price limit of $5,000. She also checked for social network availability and searched Google for similar results. So it was that “Skilljar” was born.

What she omitted to do was to check whether the name Skilljar was too similar to a trademarked name in the USA and other parts of the world.

The correct way to choose a name is to do some Google research, check that the desired domain is available, and then get a legal opinion on the name. If the results are favourable, then register a domain as well as a trademark. Trademarks are the way to stake your claim to a name. Even though it is not necessary to register a name to use it, registration gives you far better rights over a name, and puts you in a stronger position if someone else starts using the same name (which they are more likely to do if you haven’t put them on notice of your rights over the name by registering it as a trademark).

So, while Lin is advocating crowdsourcing as a quick and relatively cheap approach which took her only 8 hours and cost the comparatively modest sum of $2,195, it is important that others looking to find a new name appreciate that this expense would be completely wasted if someone else had trademark rights over the name.

As a trademark lawyer I find her decision to rebrand questionable and surprising, particularly as at no point did Lin even consider the trademark implications of her proposed name. She was willing to forfeit all brand confidence to date, and choose a new name, and did not first think to check that the new name would be available for her to use.

Whilst arguably an inconvenience to have to first find out whether someone else has trademark rights over a name, start-ups are in danger of spending thousands of pounds more on enforced rebranding, and on domain names that they are not free to use.

So, don’t just focus on a brand name’s web-friendly characteristics. Avoid a lawsuit for trade mark infringement, and make sure you are using a name you can own.

Ignorance not Bliss

Ignorance not Bliss – Avoiding liability for infringing pay-per-click advertising activity

Often, businesses treat intellectual property just as something they need to own and register, without giving enough thought to the risk of infringement. Even where the risk of infringement is considered, business owners don’t often realise that they could be liable for the actions of their contractors or employees, even if they are unaware of them.

This is increasingly a problem when it comes to social media and online marketing, and a recent dispute illustrates the risks involved. Ayesha Vardag, a prominent divorce lawyer, discovered that, unbeknownst to her, the marketing agency her firm had engaged was bidding on the name of her previous employer in order to generate enquiries through Google AdWords. Following negotiations, Vardag agreed to settle for over £40,000, as reported by The Lawyer.

European Trademark Registration

European Trademarks

European Trademark RegistrationIf you are doing business in a number of different European countries then, rather than registering your trademarks in each jurisdiction separately, you will likely apply for protection at the European level. 

This enables you, through a single application, to  secure protection in all 28 countries (and counting). 

Unless you only need protection in one or two member states, a European trademark is a far more cost effective, and straightforward solution.

However, it is not without its risks. While a trademark application in just a single country generally just faces the possibility of an objection from other brand owners in that country, a European Community Trademark can be opposed by an existing trademark owner in any one of the 28 member countries of the EU.  This would then block the entire trademark.

So, how can you minimise your risks? The key is to commission professional searches to identify potential obstacles before you commit to a mark, and file your application. You might begin by initially looking at the UK and European trademark registers, before then expanding the search to the national registers of each EU country. International searches like this can be quite expensive, and offer diminishing returns, so it is important to discuss what degree of searching is appropriate with your legal adviser. It is never possible to eliminate the risks entirely, but through appropriate searches, you can improve your chances without blowing your budget. Your attitude to risk, and the funds you are willing to commit to searching, will generally depend upon how critical your brand is to your business.

But what if you do encounter a problem? That is not necessarily the end of the road. If your European application is opposed by a business with rights in just a single member state, the first step will generally be to negotiate with them, and see if it is possible to come to an agreement allowing both businesses to coexist. Under some circumstances, it might not be possible to reach an amicable settlement, in which case the European trademark courts may resolve the dispute.  However, this can be costly for all involved.

If, ultimately, you do decide it is best to withdraw your application in that particular country, all is not lost as you are free to file national applications in those European countries from which you did not face an objection. However, there are no guarantees that those national applications would not face objections from other trademark owners.

A key issue when it comes to trademarks is what is known as the priority date. Typically, this is the date on which you file your trademark application, and the date from which your registration is effective. If you were to entirely withdraw your application following a dispute, and refile national applications, then you would receive a new priority date. However, it is possible to convert a European trademark application into a group of national applications, and retain your original priority date. An important advantage of doing so, is that your application will, broadly speaking, take precedence over others which were filed in the interim.

Still, converting a European application to national applications, or refiling directly in the relevant countries, can become very expensive as fees are payable in respect of each territory. So, where resources allow, it is best to carry out appropriate searches in advance. You can find out more about national, and international trademark registration on our dedicated website AzrightsTradeMarkRegistration.co.uk.

Entertainment_jpg

Battle of the Bands

Entertainment_jpgTrademarks can be one of the most significant of IP rights as a recent case involving the band Wishbone Ash  demonstrates.

The band was popular in the 1970s, and as often happens with bands, members came and went, so that eventually Andy Powell was the last man standing from the original group. He nurtured a new team so that the Wishbone Ash band still performs under that name. He registered the name as a European Community trademark. Then a former band member, Martin Turner set up a new band under the name calling his band Martin Turner’s Wishbone Ash. So, Andy Powell successfully applied for an injunction to stop the use of the name Wishbone Ash. Martin Turner is apparently appealing the court’s decision. The judge awarded Andy Powell more than £40,000 in costs and has ordered Martin Turner to deliver up all flyers, CD covers and other material which bears the Wishbone Ash name.

Over on Azrights trademark registration blog we recently reported the Nestle v Cadbury case which demonstrates how difficult it can be to secure trademark protection for colours. We also discussed the lessons to be learned from the Duffins trademark case about what to do during product creation in order to protect your brand.

 

Trademark Registration A Lack of Finality?

Trademark Registration – A Lack of Finality?

Trademark Registration a lack of Finality?Over half a million trademark applications are filed each year throughout Europe, and a memo of the European Commission indicates that as of March 2013 there were nearly 10 million trademarks listed in European registers. Putting it mildly, the Commission notes that “The demand for trade mark protection is high”. But if you consider the essential purpose of trademarks, a problem starts to emerge.

Are the Trademark Registers too Crowded?

At their most basic, trademarks are a way for consumers to tell the goods and services of one business apart from those of another. In principle, trade mark rights can also last indefinitely. So, if the number of trade marks registered continues to grow in this fashion, with every combination, and every permutation being snapped up, surely businesses will run out of words to use? Some people worry that it is already difficult to find a good .com domain name, but what would be the impact if you faced an uphill struggle when looking for a brand name you could use in general? What if all possible brand names were taken, what would you call your new business, or products?

Fortunately, even if the rate at which trademarks are applied for is set to increase significantly, this scenario is far from becoming a reality. First of all, just to cover all possible combinations of letters and numbers with marks only as long as the word ADIDAS would mean every single human being on the planet registering at least 10 trade marks, and that doesn’t take into account stylised text, logos, sounds, colours, shapes or other types of trademark. Of course, the scope of protection extends further than basic identity – the use of a similar word can constitute infringement of a registered trademark, so not every combination of characters need be registered before it becomes difficult to conceive something novel. However, this becomes even less of a problem once you account for the fact that the same trademark can be registered by different owners who are not competitors, but even so, the cluttering of the trademark registers is undoubtedly a valid concern.

Trademark Revocation

That’s why the role of trademark revocation is important. Trademark registrations are not immortal, and although it’s feasible to maintain them indefinitely provided that renewal fees are paid promptly, there are a number of grounds on which a registration might be challenged. One of the fundamental grounds on which you might apply for revocation of a registered trademark is that it isn’t being used.  Richard Arnold QC put it like this:

“The purpose of revocation is to remove trade marks or parts of the specifications of trade marks where there has not been use. It is there to serve a purpose in trade; it is the Lipitor that stops the arteries of commerce being blocked with the cholesterol of unused trade marks”

Broadly speaking, if a trademark is left languishing for a continuous period of 5 years, it is vulnerable to revocation. So, out with the old (owner) and in with the new. But this is far from the only reason a trademark might be struck from the registers.

As discussed above, the purpose of a trade mark is to help consumers distinguish the goods and services of one undertaking from those of another, and once a word becomes the common name for something, it can lose this ability to designate origin. This process is referred to by trade mark professionals as genericide – once a trade mark becomes generic it loses its distinctive character. Some common examples of genericide are Hoover and Escalator – both of which are brand names which have become accepted into general language. Once this happens, trademark registrations are on shaky ground.

Although far less common, another basis for revocation of a registered trademark is the argument that it is likely to mislead the public, for example if the trademark suggests that products have a particular geographical origin, or a particular quality when in fact they do not.

Invalidation

Aside from revocation, registrations can also be declared invalid. Whereas the impact of revocation is that the mark is removed from the registers, if a trademark is declared invalid it is treated as never having been registered at all. Trademark applications occasionally slip through the net, and so a registration might be invalidated if later on, it is discovered that a similar or identical trademark was already registered by someone else, or because another business had built up rights in a conflicting trademark by using it. Alternatively, having been reassessed the trademark could be deemed descriptive in retrospect, and therefore lacking the ability to distinguish the origin of goods and service.

Should I still try to Register my Trademark?

So, registration is feasibly indefinite, but there are no guarantees as it suffers from a lack of finality. Does this mean it isn’t worth registering? Absolutely not. The key message here is that there is far more to registering a trademark than simply making it onto the registers. All of the risks mentioned above can be managed by taking care at the outset. By casting a critical eye over your trademark before applying for registration, an expert will be able to assess whether it might later be deemed descriptive, or deceptive, and a professional search will reduce the chances of conflicting rights turning up out of the blue later on. They will also be able to advise you of ways to maintain your registration, for example by using the registered trademark symbol you may be able to avoid genericide, alerting people to the fact that the mark isn’t simply a common word but an indication that you are the source of the product.

To help avoid losing your rights you should also take care to make genuine use of your trademark. The concept of genuine use is complex, and you might be surprised by some of the situations which don’t meet this test. For example, a manufacturer promoted its clothes by giving away drinks labelled with its brand, and because the freebies were not distributed with the aim of penetrating the drinks market, it was not sufficient to maintain rights over the brand in that class of goods. On a related note, it’s important that you take care to use the mark in the way it is registered, and if you do make a change, for example by altering the design of your logo, you should consider whether it’s necessary to file a fresh application for the variation.

SkyDrive

SkyDrive Set for a Skydive? – Cloud computing service faces dispute over similar trademark

SkyDriveA recent decision of the High Court provides a useful illustration of the breadth of the rights granted by trademark registration. In that ruling the use of SKYDRIVE by Microsoft for its cloud storage solutions, was found to infringe the trade mark SKY, used in connection with, among other things, broadband internet. For context it is worthwhile getting a better picture of the rights you receive in exchange for successfully registering a trademark.

When you register a brand name as a trademark, you might assume that the law will simply prevent others from using that name in their business. However, the position is somewhat more complex, and the protection you receive is in a sense both broader and narrower than that.

Regular readers of our blog are likely already aware that when registering a trademark, that registration is restricted to certain specified goods and services. For example, you might register YOURBRAND for use with clothing and accessories. While this limits the exclusivity of your rights to a certain extent, such that another business might be entitled to sell cars, or make a TV show called YOURBRAND, you may still be able to take action if another business uses the same brand with goods or services which are similar to your own. But what if the name they use isn’t exactly the same, just similar?

In fact, there are a number of situations when you might be able to take action upon discovering your registered trademark, or a similar trademark, being used without your permission. This is because the law looks in detail at whether the marks are in fact identical, or just similar, and whether they are intended to be used in connection with identical or similar goods or services.

Even if someone uses just a similar brand, with similar goods or services, you can nonetheless take action if you can show that the public is likely to be confused. If your trademark has a reputation and a similar or identical mark has been used without permission in a way which takes unfair advantage of, or is detrimental to, the reputation or distinctive character of your mark, that may also constitute infringement.

So, the strongest case arises when an identical trademark is used for identical goods or services, but neither of these elements are essential.

Returning to the recent dispute over use of SKYDRIVE on the basis of the registered trademark SKY, the court found that although the two trademarks were not identical, there was sufficient similarity between the two marks, and between the goods and services for which they were used, that a claim for infringement should succeed.

The court also found that there was infringement on the basis that Sky’s reputation in the UK is strong, that use of SKYDRIVE would reduce the distinctiveness of the SKY brand, and that Microsoft was not compelled, or otherwise had due cause to use that particular wording.

There are a vast range of factors which influence such a decision, for example in this case the fact that the word “Drive” is arguably descriptive of the service Microsoft provides, that the core goods and services provided by each business were complementary, and that third parties have created apps based on SkyDrive, such as SkyWallet, all supported the court’s judgment.

Serious repercussions can arise from unjustified claims so, given the wide range of factors that are relevant when assessing whether trademark infringement has taken place, it is important to seek specialist advice before taking action yourself.

Microsoft have said that they will appeal the decision, so the dispute is far from over, and it will be interesting to see if the company chooses to continue using the brand name despite this ruling, in the hope that they are ultimately successful.

Intellectual Property & Change Management

Intellectual Property Rights and Change Management

Intellectual Property & Change ManagementIn any business there will be rules that management and staff need to follow. Some will be more important than others. For example, to safeguard a company’s intellectual property rights, there are a couple of useful procedures that business might introduce. IP issues arise day to day so it’s important to manage them.

If a business outsources work or collaborates on projects with others it would do well to put systems in place so as to ensure valuable IP is not lost. IP generally needs to be considered very early on.

Consider the inventor of the Karaoke machine. He earned nothing from the billion dollar industry he spawned because he didn’t realise he could take steps to protect his invention so as to reap the benefits if it succeeded. Specifically he could have patented his invention. However, it’s not just patents that can have a far reaching impact. There are other crucial IP rights like copyright which can be lost if you fail to take the right steps early on in a project.

In practice a simple rule requiring particular documents to be used before a company agrees certain terms with a third party makes the difference between protecting your brand or other IP and losing potentially valuable assets. But is that the end of it or is it likely that sometimes your best laid plans will be ignored for one reason or another?

On 13 August Shireen Smith, founder of Azrights Solicitors, an intellectual property law firm, and author of the best selling book, Legally Branded, will be running a webinar to discuss this as part of a new series of webinars looking at law in its ‘real life’ business context. Shireen will be joined by Suzanne Hazelton, author of two books, Raise Your Game, and Great Days at Work. Suzanne is an expert in getting the best from people and processes. She describes herself as a peopleologist as she works with the people in a business from a behavioural perspective. She previously worked on projects such as software beta programmes within IBM, and so has a good understanding of why it is so important to have legal controls in place. At the same time her background gives her a unique insight into the frustrations legal controls can give rise to for people within an organization, and so is ideally placed to advise companies, on how to successfully manage change. During the webinar Suzanne will focus on what a company would want to do in practice, to ensure procedures are observed by staff, particularly in a fast moving, possibly multi-national environment.

The webinar will be relevant to companies, whether based in the UK or elsewhere, as the legal controls being discussed are likely to be universally applicable in most common law jurisdictions, such as the USA, and Australia to name a few. The emphasis will be less on the law, and more on the need for procedures to protect IP. So, the webinar will be relevant regardless of jurisdiction, for any business owner, or corporate in-house lawyer looking for insights into why procedures may be necessary to preserve IP, and what pitfalls they might encounter. It will give you strategies to overcome the challenges ahead.

IPKat 10th Birthday

10 Years of the IPKat!

IPKat 10th BirthdayIt was a pleasure to celebrate the 10th birthday of the IPKat yesterday with blogmeister Jeremy Phillips and friends, and having had a thoroughly enjoyable time I wanted to say a few words personally about the value Jeremy has brought to the IP community.

Managing and contributing to the IPKat, one of the most renowned, freely accessible resources of information for intellectual property enthusiasts and professionals, whilst balancing numerous other commitments like moderating and contributing to about 10 leading blogs on IP law, also set up by Jeremy, is a task Prof. Phillips does day in day out with flair and enthusiasm.

Jeremy’s innovative approach of using the internet to reach out to a wider audience beyond academics and practitioners is certainly worthy of recognition. Prior to the arrival of the internet, access to information on legal subjects would be provided in printed form. These publications would be housed in university libraries or practitioners would subscribe to the specialist magazines or journals. It was a very niche and specialist world, with considerable barriers to entry. Having set up the first trademark blog in the UK, Prof. Phillips was a pioneer of the use of blogging as a platform to promote the free and rapid exchange of ideas on IP and to entice the interested public to engage and read about IP issues which affect them.

Arguably Jeremy’s greatest contribution, is his peerless ability to build IP communities through writing, networking, and the events he organises, and his approach is always inclusive. His work has encouraged open international dialogue and cooperation, developed relationships between practitioners, and inspired among many an inquisitive attitude towards intellectual property that can only have a positive impact upon the way in which intangible rights benefit our society.

Jeremy’s degree of dedication to people is outstanding, as a teacher he regularly assists students in finding jobs within their chosen field, is constantly writing references for them, and has a knack of spotting and nurturing talent.  He regularly organises free seminars and events, and while developing an engaging community where there would have been none before, Jeremy also still finds the time to give individualised responses to all those who write to him or comment on his network of blogs.  Overall, it’s not an exaggeration to say that no other individual has shown this level of commitment to the IP community, and I’m looking forward to what Jeremy and the IPKat have in store for the next 10 years!

This post was co-authored by Stefano Debolini